Hello, folks,
I am in the process of re-assembling my 327/300HP (bored .030 over w/ new L2165 flat top pistons, Edelbrock Performer intake, stock AFB, Hooker headers & sidepipes) NOM for my 63 convertible (4-speed, 3:70 posi). A few years back, when gathering parts, I purchased a Crane Blueprint series 350HP cam for use this engine. However, after reviewing many posts in the NCRS archives, I am leaning strongly towards going back to the 929 300HP cam instead.
Agree? Disagree? Any reason to consider keeping the 350HP cam in this engine?
Also, Duke, if you're out there, thanks for all of your contributions to this forum - your posts made a very good case for sticking with the 300HP cam. You recommended pocket porting and port matching the heads with a multiangle valve job, plus retarding the OE 929 cam four degrees.
My heads are freshly reconditioned with a three-angle valve job ( but no pocket-porting or port matching) - should I still consider retarding the cam
four degrees?
Thanks in advance to all.
I am in the process of re-assembling my 327/300HP (bored .030 over w/ new L2165 flat top pistons, Edelbrock Performer intake, stock AFB, Hooker headers & sidepipes) NOM for my 63 convertible (4-speed, 3:70 posi). A few years back, when gathering parts, I purchased a Crane Blueprint series 350HP cam for use this engine. However, after reviewing many posts in the NCRS archives, I am leaning strongly towards going back to the 929 300HP cam instead.
Agree? Disagree? Any reason to consider keeping the 350HP cam in this engine?
Also, Duke, if you're out there, thanks for all of your contributions to this forum - your posts made a very good case for sticking with the 300HP cam. You recommended pocket porting and port matching the heads with a multiangle valve job, plus retarding the OE 929 cam four degrees.
My heads are freshly reconditioned with a three-angle valve job ( but no pocket-porting or port matching) - should I still consider retarding the cam
four degrees?
Thanks in advance to all.
Comment