1971 wiper blade replacements - NCRS Discussion Boards

1971 wiper blade replacements

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Paul C.
    Very Frequent User
    • November 12, 2007
    • 511

    1971 wiper blade replacements

    The wiper replacements I purchased are silver-stainless color--the part that holds the blade. My original blade is held by a metal piece that is flat black in color. Which is correct? I can just put the new rubber in the black metal piece. Thanks
  • Terry M.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • September 30, 1980
    • 15573

    #2
    Re: 1971 wiper blade replacements

    Flat Black is correct.
    Some judges look for the number of ribs on the rubber, and those with good eyesight even look for the patent numbers.
    Terry

    Comment

    • Paul C.
      Very Frequent User
      • November 12, 2007
      • 511

      #3
      Re: 1971 wiper blade replacements

      How many ribs are there supposed to be and what is the patent number. Thanks

      Comment

      • Terry M.
        Beyond Control Poster
        • September 30, 1980
        • 15573

        #4
        Re: 1971 wiper blade replacements

        The number of ribs is called out in the 1970-72 TIM&JG which I don't have with me at work. I would hate to give you the wrong number, so if no one comes up with it sooner I'll get it for you tonight. I would guess it is two, but it is best to consult the source.

        I haven't a clue what the patent numbers should be. I can't read those small numbers without a good scope, and the guys who regularly judge C3 exterior are not frequent posters here. My bet is if you have any patent numbers on the rubber you will be OK. We are all (well most of us, anyway) of that age when eyesight is one of the things that go.
        Terry

        Comment

        • Jack H.
          Extremely Frequent Poster
          • April 1, 1990
          • 9906

          #5
          Re: 1971 wiper blade replacements

          Originally posted by Terry McManmon (3966)
          Flat Black is correct.
          Some judges look for the number of ribs on the rubber, and those with good eyesight even look for the patent numbers.
          And, the 'rail' that holds the refill rubber was black as well as the underside surfaces of the blade holder. That's why the text in the JG reads to the effect of the wiper arm/blades having NO non-blacked surfaces....

          Comment

          • Pat M.
            Extremely Frequent Poster
            • April 1, 2006
            • 1575

            #6
            Re: 1971 wiper blade replacements

            Paul - the Judging Guide calls for two ribs.
            I bought some inserts on ebay a while back that seemed pretty close, and they received no deductions at the National. But they appear to have three ribs to me, or maybe what I'm counting as a rib isn't?
            Anyhoo, the patent wording/numbers on mine (as best as I can read them) are:

            "one or more patents 2543383, 2687544, 2697241, 2766474, 2834976, BR, 683375, 702899, 702900, 702849 CAN. 52,55,58 patent pend."
            Attached Files

            Comment

            Working...

            Debug Information

            Searching...Please wait.
            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
            An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
            There are no results that meet this criteria.
            Search Result for "|||"