63 frame tag - NCRS Discussion Boards

63 frame tag

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Michael H.
    Expired
    • January 29, 2008
    • 7477

    #31
    Re: 63 frame tag

    Originally posted by John Hinckley (29964)
    The "big" plant had a Receiving Inspection/Salvage Department that could do dimensional checking with table-top surface plates (granite slabs) and various measurement devices, Central Office-supplied part "go - no go" checking fixtures, Rockwell hardness testers, and things of that nature, but I've never seen anything more exotic than that in terms of what we understand as "lab testing" in any Chevrolet assembly plant.
    Thanks john. I wasn't making much progress on this one and needed a little back up.
    I knew there was no such operation in the little Corvette building. There just wasn't any place at that facility for anything like that with the limited amount of space available. They were fortunate to even actually have a lunch room.

    As I previously mentioned, people seem to have a somewhat distorted vision of what went on there and what the operation was actually like.

    I never saw anyone inspecting new incomming material. It was tossed on the conveyor and installed on the body/chassis.
    The only fixture I do remember is the hood dimension checking fixture in the front end sub assembly area. A last and final check of the panel to make sure it retained it's configuration during shipping/storage. That had nothing to do with random inspection/testing though.

    Comment

    • Dick W.
      Former NCRS Director Region IV
      • June 30, 1985
      • 10483

      #32
      Re: 63 frame tag

      What you are describing is what I saw to be typical of all the plants, GM, Chrysler, Ford, Mack, Diamond Reo, IH, that I visited during that era. They were strictly assembly plants.
      Dick Whittington

      Comment

      • Michael G.
        Extremely Frequent Poster
        • November 12, 2008
        • 2155

        #33
        Re: 63 frame tag

        The degree of corrosion of this frame is consistent with what I've seen in severe proving grounds tests. The part obviously was painted after it rotted, though, and there's absolutely no reason GM would have painted over the corrosion after a test.

        It's possible that such a frame might have made it out of GM's hands intact, (whole vehicles have shown up which were required to be, and supposedly were, "scraped"), but I sincerely doubt that anyone who could actually get a frame out of GM unscathed would bother with any part that was remotely this bad.

        If it was once a test or pilot vehicle frame that was "spirited" out of GM, I'd guess that it was not a corrosion test vehicle, that most of the corrosion happened later, in service on some post GM vehicle.

        Mike

        Comment

        • Art A.
          Expired
          • June 30, 1984
          • 834

          #34
          Re: 63 frame tag







          When the brutal GM Saltwater testing was conducted, (usually at the MPG) NOBODY within GM would ever consider stealing, buying, or selling said parts or vehicle. It was a very nasty test.

          Comment

          Working...

          Debug Information

          Searching...Please wait.
          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
          An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
          There are no results that meet this criteria.
          Search Result for "|||"