I gave my desktop a Christmas present in the form of an Intel X-25 solid state disk to replace my SATA, rotating platter, HDD. MAN, I need to equip my office desk chair with a set of seat belts now!!!
This all started when I saw a holiday special deal on a Blu Ray drive to replace my DVD drive. It should have delivered a 2-4X speed increase for doing system backups, but ran about the same elapsed time with the new Blu Ray drive as it did with the older DVD drive. This peaked my curiousity...why?
Using various Microsoft utilities, I found the lion's share of my CPU was 'stuck' in the System Idle task during the backup task. Hum, while rotating disks ARE fast today, there's still a 7 mSec average latency time for the R/W head to seek and begin the read/write process. Run a quickie calculation...
Suppose the backup job entails 1,000,000 file fetch actions. At 7 mSec per fetch, that works out to 1.9 HOURS of the system sitting on its arse waiting on the HDD!
So, having a chat with Rob Musquetier, I discovered Intel's rather new product line of flash memory based 1.8-inch/2.5-inch solid state disk drives and did some searches of various comparison test reviews. Wow!
Rather cost effective (about $200 for an 80 GB drive and $400+ for a 160 GB drive) with a performance break through in multi-layer NAND gate flash memory construction. Bottom line, these drives ROAR with almost NO latency and I/O rates for read/write operations that rival today's top drawer HDD's using rotating magnetic memory platters.
I bought one, did the upgrade and my computer runs FAST! How fast? Well, I used to push the power button and go get a cup of coffee while the system started and Windows loaded. It took 5-7 minutes for Windows to come up with ALL of its supporting tasks loaded and operational.
Now, I turn the system on and she's up in about 30 seconds!!! I suspect it'd be faster if there weren't certain tasks (anti-virus/firewall) that have to crawl out through the communication link to check with 'mother' over the internet to complete their load/start...
About my Blu Ray disk drive and the system backup task that took so long? Once the Intel SSD was installed, my backup time decreased significantly but still didn't 'push' the read/write specs of the Blu Ray drive.
Another inspection with Microsoft's Process Explorer and the 'second' bottleneck was revealed! Another task (my system firewall + anti-virus code) was hogging as much system run time as the Blu Ray drive.
I hit the OFF button on my cable modem, and temporarily killed my AV + firewall tasks. When I re-ran my backup job, it ROARED climbing right up to the Blu Ray drive's specified I/O rates...
Bottom line, if you're thinking about upgrading your computer, my conclusion is a new motherboard, faster processor, more/faster memory, Etc. is pretty much a waste of time/$$$. I'll bet you aren't really pushing the hardware you have currently due to the technical constraints of your existing HDD and your best 'bang' for the buck is replacing the HDD with a SSD...
This all started when I saw a holiday special deal on a Blu Ray drive to replace my DVD drive. It should have delivered a 2-4X speed increase for doing system backups, but ran about the same elapsed time with the new Blu Ray drive as it did with the older DVD drive. This peaked my curiousity...why?
Using various Microsoft utilities, I found the lion's share of my CPU was 'stuck' in the System Idle task during the backup task. Hum, while rotating disks ARE fast today, there's still a 7 mSec average latency time for the R/W head to seek and begin the read/write process. Run a quickie calculation...
Suppose the backup job entails 1,000,000 file fetch actions. At 7 mSec per fetch, that works out to 1.9 HOURS of the system sitting on its arse waiting on the HDD!
So, having a chat with Rob Musquetier, I discovered Intel's rather new product line of flash memory based 1.8-inch/2.5-inch solid state disk drives and did some searches of various comparison test reviews. Wow!
Rather cost effective (about $200 for an 80 GB drive and $400+ for a 160 GB drive) with a performance break through in multi-layer NAND gate flash memory construction. Bottom line, these drives ROAR with almost NO latency and I/O rates for read/write operations that rival today's top drawer HDD's using rotating magnetic memory platters.
I bought one, did the upgrade and my computer runs FAST! How fast? Well, I used to push the power button and go get a cup of coffee while the system started and Windows loaded. It took 5-7 minutes for Windows to come up with ALL of its supporting tasks loaded and operational.
Now, I turn the system on and she's up in about 30 seconds!!! I suspect it'd be faster if there weren't certain tasks (anti-virus/firewall) that have to crawl out through the communication link to check with 'mother' over the internet to complete their load/start...
About my Blu Ray disk drive and the system backup task that took so long? Once the Intel SSD was installed, my backup time decreased significantly but still didn't 'push' the read/write specs of the Blu Ray drive.
Another inspection with Microsoft's Process Explorer and the 'second' bottleneck was revealed! Another task (my system firewall + anti-virus code) was hogging as much system run time as the Blu Ray drive.
I hit the OFF button on my cable modem, and temporarily killed my AV + firewall tasks. When I re-ran my backup job, it ROARED climbing right up to the Blu Ray drive's specified I/O rates...
Bottom line, if you're thinking about upgrading your computer, my conclusion is a new motherboard, faster processor, more/faster memory, Etc. is pretty much a waste of time/$$$. I'll bet you aren't really pushing the hardware you have currently due to the technical constraints of your existing HDD and your best 'bang' for the buck is replacing the HDD with a SSD...
Comment