67 on ebay

[David L.]

anyone get a chance to view the 67 427 on ebay item no 120529491495 maybe its me but something doesnt seem to jive with the stamp pad as well as the build date, comments?

[Lawrence S.]

Re: 67 on ebay

Yes I saw that car and stamp. I am no expert, but the stamp did look a bit ragged.

[Dick W.]

Re: 67 on ebay

Run Forrest, run

[Lawrence S.]

Re: 67 on ebay

As I thought.

[Jack C.]

Re: 67 on ebay

Matching #'s, yes. Restamp yes. IMHO.

[Michael H.]

Re: 67 on ebay

Run Forrest, run

Yes, and run fast. That's a horrible restamp. Looks like something that was done in the mid 70's at the dawn of the restamped block era.

[Dick W.]

Re: 67 on ebay

Yes, and run fast. That's a horrible restamp. Looks like something that was done in the mid 70's at the dawn of the restamped block era.

Sure was not done by Don? in the Chicago area. His stamps were light years ahead of anyone during that era

[Michael H.]

Re: 67 on ebay

Sure was not done by Don? in the Chicago area. His stamps were light years ahead of anyone during that era

Yes, Don was ahead of his time on restamping. I've seen a lot of his work.

[Ronald L.]

Re: 67 on ebay

Looks like he had too much by the time he got to the "E".

How about these trans stamps?? - this guy is "trying" to tell me all 63-65 Muncies were hand stamped.

Look at these 2 ebays postings:

140373402178

140382811635

Mine and any other 66/67 I have seen are clearly straight and gang stamped.

Any knowledge on these stamps???

[Dick W.]

Re: 67 on ebay

Yes, Don was ahead of his time on restamping. I've seen a lot of his work.

I know where there is a set of his stamps still being used today. They just updated a few of the characters and will pass muster most of the time, just like all the other restampers