Re: 3857584 tail housing date codes
Sure enough, an example of mark mentioned in 2nd paragraph pops up on eBay yesterday, and yes, the seller is claiming M22, in spite of the two circumferential rings on the input shaft (ie. wide ratio), and the fact that the 'A-B-C' suffix identification system didn't begin until P9R21s (s = suffix) [Oct 21st 1968].
Ron -- yes, I'm guessing that those are the assembler's personal stamp. You begin to see this on some of the 1966's. (I can't recall if '67s as well).
Sometimes it is a half-height character in the shape of a square with the right vertical side removed, leading some eBay sellers on benzedrine to claim it's a "C" and therefore they have an M22
.
Sometimes it is a half-height character in the shape of a square with the right vertical side removed, leading some eBay sellers on benzedrine to claim it's a "C" and therefore they have an M22
.Sure enough, an example of mark mentioned in 2nd paragraph pops up on eBay yesterday, and yes, the seller is claiming M22, in spite of the two circumferential rings on the input shaft (ie. wide ratio), and the fact that the 'A-B-C' suffix identification system didn't begin until P9R21s (s = suffix) [Oct 21st 1968].
Comment