C-1 drivetrain angles - NCRS Discussion Boards

C-1 drivetrain angles

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • David B.
    Very Frequent User
    • July 31, 2004
    • 330

    C-1 drivetrain angles

    I searched and read the archive posts on this topic but have a question on setting up the shims correctly between the transmission mounting plate and frame on a '57:

    If the "canceled angle" between the transmission output shaft and the pinion angle is set up to be close to zero degrees (or some other recommended angle?) by shimming, is that a preferred setup? Also, does it matter what the driveshaft angle is?

    I am measuring off the oil pan rails and off the bottom of the rear housing to pick up my inclinations of the trans output shaft and the pinion angle (assuming the bottom of the carrier case is parallel to the pinion shaft).

    After shimming the trans carrier bracket down 3/8", my measurements are:
    pinion angle = 1 degree, positive
    trans output angle = 1 degree, positive
    driveshaft angle 9 = degrees, positive
    canceled angle = (1-1) = 0 degrees
    *all angles measured relative to the horizon
    **positive defined as higher toward front of car
    Therefore, the angle between the driveshaft and the pinion shaft is (9-1)=8 degrees with the car in its natural stance.

    Does this setup sound ok, subject to a road test? Or, should I be shimming to a different angle to offset rear leaf spring travel under acceleration?

    Thanks,
    Dave
    Dave, 1969 427, 1957
    Previous: 1968 427, 1973 454
  • Doug F.
    Very Frequent User
    • November 1, 1983
    • 322

    #2
    Re: C-1 drivetrain angles

    i have never worried about degree of angle, as long as the shifter clears the tunnel and the drive shaft, yoke and ujoint also clear everything, you are good to go, some cars require spacers, others don't, if your spring arch varies greatly from original, you might have an angle issue,

    Comment

    • John H.
      Beyond Control Poster
      • December 1, 1997
      • 16513

      #3
      Re: C-1 drivetrain angles

      David -

      C1's have defied the accepted engineering rules of U-joint operating angle limitations for 50 years; I shimmed the trans crossmember down about 3/8" from the frame on all of mine and never had an issue.

      Comment

      • David B.
        Very Frequent User
        • July 31, 2004
        • 330

        #4
        Re: C-1 drivetrain angles

        Doug, John,

        Sounds good. Thanks very much for the replies. I will button it up and see how it drives.

        Dave B.
        Dave, 1969 427, 1957
        Previous: 1968 427, 1973 454

        Comment

        • Robert G.
          Expired
          • May 31, 1990
          • 429

          #5
          Re: C-1 drivetrain angles

          You can probably check the U-joint manufacturer's website to see what they say the maximum angle should be. I seem to recall that 3 degrees was optimum and this website has some good info on it.
          Trail Tested, Competition Proven, Show Quality Driveshafts and Slip Yoke Eliminators for Jeep Wranglers, Cherokees, Ford Broncos and more.

          Comment

          • David B.
            Very Frequent User
            • July 31, 2004
            • 330

            #6
            Re: C-1 drivetrain angles

            Robert,

            Thanks very much for the link. I had not seen that site.

            I see it recommends not exceeding 7 degrees u-joint angle - I have 8 degrees with no driver or passenger weight. (I think that with my overweight self in the seat, it should make 7 degrees ok).

            Based on that info, it also seems that I shouldn't shim it any further down, and possibly could remove some shims, so long as I have adequate tunnel clearances.

            Thanks for the information. This has been educational for me. Between you, John, and Doug, all of my questions have been answered.

            Dave
            Dave, 1969 427, 1957
            Previous: 1968 427, 1973 454

            Comment

            • Edward M.
              Extremely Frequent Poster
              • November 1, 1985
              • 1916

              #7
              Re: C-1 drivetrain angles

              I just went through this with my 56. I initially had a vibration at speed. After following John Hinckley and others suggestion about getting zero cancelled angle, the vibration went away.

              Mine needed to be shimmed down about 3/8 of an inch.

              Comment

              • David B.
                Very Frequent User
                • July 31, 2004
                • 330

                #8
                Re: C-1 drivetrain angles

                Edwards,

                Thanks for the info on your '56. It seems that 3/8" is the general consensus dimension, unless there is tunnel interference.

                Strangely, I did not find anything in the ST-12 or the AIM on this subject when first researching this. Consequently, the info from you and the other contributors to this thread should be really helpful to others in the future as well as me.

                Thanks,
                Dave
                Dave, 1969 427, 1957
                Previous: 1968 427, 1973 454

                Comment

                • John H.
                  Beyond Control Poster
                  • December 1, 1997
                  • 16513

                  #9
                  Re: C-1 drivetrain angles

                  Originally posted by David Banwarth (42369)
                  Edwards,

                  Thanks for the info on your '56. It seems that 3/8" is the general consensus dimension, unless there is tunnel interference.

                  Strangely, I did not find anything in the ST-12 or the AIM on this subject when first researching this. Consequently, the info from you and the other contributors to this thread should be really helpful to others in the future as well as me.

                  Thanks,
                  Dave
                  Dave -

                  There were several TSB's on this driveline vibration issue over the years - one in 1959 told the dealers to install tapered shims between the rear axle spring pads and the springs to change the pinion angle, and another one in 1961 told them to shim the transmission crossmember down 1/4" - 3/8".

                  Comment

                  • David B.
                    Very Frequent User
                    • July 31, 2004
                    • 330

                    #10
                    Re: C-1 drivetrain angles

                    John,

                    Is there a source you know of to find a complete set of the TSB's?

                    Thanks,
                    Dave
                    Dave, 1969 427, 1957
                    Previous: 1968 427, 1973 454

                    Comment

                    • John H.
                      Beyond Control Poster
                      • December 1, 1997
                      • 16513

                      #11
                      Re: C-1 drivetrain angles

                      Originally posted by David Banwarth (42369)
                      John,

                      Is there a source you know of to find a complete set of the TSB's?

                      Thanks,
                      Dave
                      Dave -

                      Not that I'm aware of.

                      Comment

                      • David B.
                        Very Frequent User
                        • July 31, 2004
                        • 330

                        #12
                        Re: C-1 drivetrain angles

                        John,

                        There seems to be a solution forthcoming...

                        https://www.forums.ncrs.org/showthre...809#post499162

                        Dave
                        Dave, 1969 427, 1957
                        Previous: 1968 427, 1973 454

                        Comment

                        Working...

                        Debug Information

                        Searching...Please wait.
                        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                        An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                        There are no results that meet this criteria.
                        Search Result for "|||"