NOS VS Reproduction - NCRS Discussion Boards

NOS VS Reproduction

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lyndon S.
    Expired
    • April 30, 1988
    • 1027

    NOS VS Reproduction

    would it be better to use NOS T-3 bulbs or buy reproduction ones for flight judging?
  • Gerard Q.
    Very Frequent User
    • February 1, 2000
    • 284

    #2
    Re: NOS VS Reproduction

    You'll lose 3 points using the repo lamps.

    Comment

    • Pete B.
      Very Frequent User
      • February 22, 2007
      • 318

      #3
      Re: NOS VS Reproduction

      FWIW...
      The current T-3 repo's that I put on my car did not get any deduct. They fit the description in the judging guide.
      Pete Bergmann
      2005 - 2013 C6 National Teamleader

      Comment

      • Chris E.
        Extremely Frequent Poster
        • November 3, 2006
        • 1322

        #4
        Re: NOS VS Reproduction

        Flight Judging is all about minimizing the POTENTIAL for deductions, in my mind.

        With that, I would get a brand new set of repops and put them in. The WORST you'll get is a 3 point deduct for DOT repop headlights.

        If you put ORIGINAL T3s in, you could completely fail the 25 point line item in the Ops section for headlights. That hurts a lot more.
        Chris Enstrom
        North Central Chapter Judging Chairman
        1967 Rally Red convertible, 327/350, 4 speed, Duntov @ Hampton in 2013, Founders @ KC in 2014, family owned since 1973
        2011 Z06, red/red

        Comment

        • Michael W.
          Expired
          • April 1, 1997
          • 4290

          #5
          Re: NOS VS Reproduction

          If the NOS bulbs are truly 'old, off the shelf unused stock' they may or may not match production style lamps. If they do match and are unused I would expect they'd be worth their weight in gold and be comparable to the $600 air filter.

          Used production bulbs often carry a condition deduction due to discoloration of the lens.

          Comment

          • Terry M.
            Beyond Control Poster
            • September 30, 1980
            • 15573

            #6
            Re: NOS VS Reproduction

            Originally posted by Michael Ward (29001)
            If the NOS bulbs are truly 'old, off the shelf unused stock' they may or may not match production style lamps. If they do match and are unused I would expect they'd be worth their weight in gold and be comparable to the $600 air filter.

            Used production bulbs often carry a condition deduction due to discoloration of the lens.
            Not to mention one runs the risk of those NOS or used original bulbs burning out every time they are powered up.

            Pete if you did not receive a deduction for the T-3 reproduction bulbs you got lucky. There should have been a deduction. Unfortunately, since I don't do exterior I don't know the points quantity, but it has been posted on the board in the past. I believe the deduct should be the same for C2 or C3 reproduction bulbs.
            Terry

            Comment

            • Lyndon S.
              Expired
              • April 30, 1988
              • 1027

              #7
              Re: NOS VS Reproduction

              what is geting a deduct the DOT? Do the new repops still have them, or did some one take them off?

              Comment

              • Gary B.
                Extremely Frequent Poster
                • February 1, 1997
                • 6979

                #8
                Re: NOS VS Reproduction

                Originally posted by Lyndon Sharpton (12791)
                what is geting a deduct the DOT? Do the new repops still have them, or did some one take them off?
                Lyndon,

                I talked with Lectric Limited last year about repro T3 bulbs for my '66 and I was told that by federal law Lectric Limited had to put the DOT making on them.

                Gary

                Comment

                • David L.
                  Expired
                  • July 31, 1980
                  • 3310

                  #9
                  Re: NOS VS Reproduction

                  Back in the late 1980's I found had four NOS T-3 bulbs that came in two Chevrolet dual headlight assemblies. Three of the four NOS bulbs burned out when I tested them.

                  Comment

                  • Jack H.
                    Extremely Frequent Poster
                    • April 1, 1990
                    • 9906

                    #10
                    Re: NOS VS Reproduction

                    That's true of MANY reproduction parts... If they're made & sold today, they generally have to meet current guidelines.

                    You'll find clear plastic covering the slots on reproduction seat belt buckles due to regulations that safeguard against possible metal to fabric fray. Expect the belt fabric material to meet current tensile strength requirements instead of the 3500, 5000, or 6500 lbs that was in effect when the original belts were built.

                    The list of changes that are detectable in reproduction vs. original parts due to Federal lawmaking and regulation is LONG. That's reality!

                    Comment

                    • Terry M.
                      Beyond Control Poster
                      • September 30, 1980
                      • 15573

                      #11
                      Re: NOS VS Reproduction

                      Originally posted by Lyndon Sharpton (12791)
                      what is geting a deduct the DOT? Do the new repops still have them, or did some one take them off?
                      Yes, yes and no. I believe the DOT mark is on the inside of the glass, making it a little difficult to remove.
                      Terry

                      Comment

                      • Pat M.
                        Extremely Frequent Poster
                        • April 1, 2006
                        • 1575

                        #12
                        Re: NOS VS Reproduction

                        Originally posted by Chris Enstrom (46481)
                        Flight Judging is all about minimizing the POTENTIAL for deductions, in my mind.

                        With that, I would get a brand new set of repops and put them in. The WORST you'll get is a 3 point deduct for DOT repop headlights.

                        If you put ORIGINAL T3s in, you could completely fail the 25 point line item in the Ops section for headlights. That hurts a lot more.
                        I agree. Plus, I've found the repos are somewhat brighter than the originals and so are better for night driving.

                        Comment

                        • Gary B.
                          Extremely Frequent Poster
                          • February 1, 1997
                          • 6979

                          #13
                          Re: NOS VS Reproduction

                          Originally posted by Terry McManmon (3966)
                          ... I believe the DOT mark is on the inside of the glass...
                          Terry,

                          That is my understanding as well.

                          Gary

                          Comment

                          • Reba W.
                            Very Frequent User
                            • June 30, 1985
                            • 932

                            #14
                            Re: NOS VS Reproduction

                            From the 8th Edition Judging Reference Manual:

                            Headlamps, discernible by the DOT marking for these model years are a three-(3) point deduction per car for a full set.

                            Comment

                            • Gary J.
                              Extremely Frequent Poster
                              • April 1, 1980
                              • 1229

                              #15
                              Re: NOS VS Reproduction

                              If you put ORIGINAL T3s in, you could completely fail the 25 point line item in the Ops section for headlights. That hurts a lot more.

                              The only way that you will lose the 25 point total is for all of them (4) not to work.

                              Comment

                              Working...

                              Debug Information

                              Searching...Please wait.
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                              There are no results that meet this criteria.
                              Search Result for "|||"