69 Wiper Blade Insert Detailing - NCRS Discussion Boards

69 Wiper Blade Insert Detailing

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Wes G.
    Frequent User
    • December 1, 1999
    • 99

    69 Wiper Blade Insert Detailing

    Was the metal strip in the 69 wiper blade insert blacked out, partially blacked out or left shiny?

    The 68-69 TIM & JG (p. 26) makes no reference to this strip.

    However, the 70-72 TIM & JG (p. 40) states "The wiper blade insert should have no bright metal in it."

    Thanks
    Wes69 Wiper Blade Insert_RH_AF_08.pdf69 Wiper Blade Insert_RH_AF_010.pdf69 Wiper Blade Insert_RH_AF_011.pdf
  • Terry M.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • September 30, 1980
    • 15573

    #2
    Re: 69 Wiper Blade Insert Detailing

    Originally posted by Wes Gans (33239)
    Was the metal strip in the 69 wiper blade insert blacked out, partially blacked out or left shiny?

    The 68-69 TIM & JG (p. 26) makes no reference to this strip.

    However, the 70-72 TIM & JG (p. 40) states "The wiper blade insert should have no bright metal in it."

    Thanks
    Wes[ATTACH]37043[/ATTACH][ATTACH]37044[/ATTACH][ATTACH]37045[/ATTACH]
    I expect 1969 was the same as 1970, but I have yet to see a 1969 with original wiper blade inserts. Maybe someone here has one, and will speak up.
    Terry

    Comment

    • Ralph S.
      Expired
      • February 1, 1985
      • 935

      #3
      Re: 69 Wiper Blade Insert Detailing

      Just went to the garage to look at my 45,000 mile 69 that i have owned since 1978 and the insert on the rubber blade is black

      Comment

      • Mark D.
        Extremely Frequent Poster
        • June 30, 1988
        • 2142

        #4
        Re: 69 Wiper Blade Insert Detailing

        It has what I would call black goop coating. That is to say I'm not sure what it is. I apologize, this is a bad pic so I'll try to get a better one later...

        Kramden

        Comment

        • Joe L.
          Beyond Control Poster
          • February 1, 1988
          • 43193

          #5
          Re: 69 Wiper Blade Insert Detailing

          Originally posted by Wes Gans (33239)
          Was the metal strip in the 69 wiper blade insert blacked out, partially blacked out or left shiny?

          The 68-69 TIM & JG (p. 26) makes no reference to this strip.

          However, the 70-72 TIM & JG (p. 40) states "The wiper blade insert should have no bright metal in it."

          Thanks
          Wes[ATTACH]37043[/ATTACH][ATTACH]37044[/ATTACH][ATTACH]37045[/ATTACH]

          Wes------


          Black.
          In Appreciation of John Hinckley

          Comment

          • Joe L.
            Beyond Control Poster
            • February 1, 1988
            • 43193

            #6
            Re: 69 Wiper Blade Insert Detailing

            Originally posted by Terry McManmon (3966)
            I expect 1969 was the same as 1970, but I have yet to see a 1969 with original wiper blade inserts. Maybe someone here has one, and will speak up.

            Terry-------


            I have one. I have never changed the wiper blades or inserts on my car since day-one.
            In Appreciation of John Hinckley

            Comment

            • Mark D.
              Extremely Frequent Poster
              • June 30, 1988
              • 2142

              #7
              Re: 69 Wiper Blade Insert Detailing

              Here is a pic of the previously mentioned goop...

              Kramden

              Comment

              • David L.
                Expired
                • July 31, 1980
                • 3310

                #8
                Re: 69 Wiper Blade Insert Detailing

                I have a pair of original 70 Camaro SS350 18" black chromium Trico wiper blades with original rubber inserts (assume to GM # 8798506).
                The rubber inserts have "U.S. PATENT 2697241" molded on the rubber. The metal reinforcements are dull black with 29 "loops".

                I also have several sets of NOS Trico RF-18 inserts (aka refills) that have the same "U.S. PATENT 2697241" molded on the rubber but the metal reinforcements are plain metal with 29 "loops".

                I have a pair of satin 16" Trico blades removed from a 1970 Pontiac LeMans convertible ("LT" on glass = May 1970) back in the early 1990's. The plain steel reinforcements have 25 "loops" (24 small, 1 large) and still have remnants of the rubber insert.

                I have a pair of NOS 9872322 18" black chromium wiper blades (first used on 1971 models) that are the same as my original 70 Camaro SS350 blades mentioned above EXCEPT that the dull black reinforcements do NOT have the "loops". GM # 9872322 replaced GM # 8798506 in Aug. 1971 as per Chevrolet Parts History.

                Dave

                Comment

                • David L.
                  Expired
                  • July 31, 1980
                  • 3310

                  #9
                  Re: 69 Wiper Blade Insert Detailing

                  Originally posted by Mark Donnally (13264)
                  Here is a pic of the previously mentioned goop...

                  Mark,

                  I have collected hundreds and hundreds of Trico wiper blades at junk yards and swap meets over the last 30 years and have never seen any wiper blade reinforcements with the "black goop coating".

                  Dave

                  Comment

                  • Mark D.
                    Extremely Frequent Poster
                    • June 30, 1988
                    • 2142

                    #10
                    Re: 69 Wiper Blade Insert Detailing

                    These discussions help us get the bottom of things. It surely would help if you and Joe could post clear pics of one or two of yours. I'm ready to learn...

                    Thanks,

                    Mark
                    Kramden

                    Comment

                    • Joe L.
                      Beyond Control Poster
                      • February 1, 1988
                      • 43193

                      #11
                      Re: 69 Wiper Blade Insert Detailing

                      Originally posted by Mark Donnally (13264)
                      These discussions help us get the bottom of things. It surely would help if you and Joe could post clear pics of one or two of yours. I'm ready to learn...

                      Thanks,

                      Mark

                      Mark------


                      My problem is that my car is not running yet and I have no battery in it. So, I can't open the wiper door and can't move the wipers to an observable position. I don't really want to use the manual wiper door opening method.
                      In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                      Comment

                      • Mark D.
                        Extremely Frequent Poster
                        • June 30, 1988
                        • 2142

                        #12
                        Re: 69 Wiper Blade Insert Detailing

                        Joe,

                        I'm surely not in a position to sling mud at someone for not getting their car finished.

                        Mark
                        Kramden

                        Comment

                        • David L.
                          Expired
                          • July 31, 1980
                          • 3310

                          #13
                          Re: 69 Wiper Blade Insert Detailing

                          Originally posted by Mark Donnally (13264)
                          These discussions help us get the bottom of things. It surely would help if you and Joe could post clear pics of one or two of yours. I'm ready to learn...

                          Thanks,

                          Mark
                          Here are some not so great photos. The black on the NOS 9872322 (1971 vintage) reinforcement seems to be very fine "goop" unlike the 1970 dull black reinforcement.

                          Dave
                          Attached Files

                          Comment

                          • Mark D.
                            Extremely Frequent Poster
                            • June 30, 1988
                            • 2142

                            #14
                            Re: 69 Wiper Blade Insert Detailing

                            Dave,

                            Those are excellent pics!

                            The pic I took of mine is with a high powered lens which probably shows too much detail. I believe the coating/finish on yours is the same as on mine. I'll take a pic of mine with another lens tomorrow which may compare similarly to yours. I guess my point is, it isn't a phosphate or typical painted finish. Perhaps 'goop' just doesn't adequately describe it.

                            Mark
                            Kramden

                            Comment

                            • David L.
                              Expired
                              • July 31, 1980
                              • 3310

                              #15
                              Re: 69 Wiper Blade Insert Detailing

                              Mark,

                              The "goop" on my NOS 1971 blade reinforcement is hardly noticeable. You really have to look closely. I did not notice it until I took the photos.

                              Dave

                              Comment

                              Working...

                              Debug Information

                              Searching...Please wait.
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                              There are no results that meet this criteria.
                              Search Result for "|||"