Wiper Blades - NCRS Discussion Boards

Wiper Blades

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Larry M.
    Very Frequent User
    • January 1, 2002
    • 535

    Wiper Blades

    What is the correct number for Trico DOT refills for a C2 (64)?
  • Joe L.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • February 1, 1988
    • 43193

    #2
    Re: Wiper Blades

    Originally posted by Larry Meyer (37196)
    What is the correct number for Trico DOT refills for a C2 (64)?
    Larry-----


    Assuming by "refill" you are referring to the INSERT and assuming that you are wanting to know the GM part numbers for the Trico parts, the original part number was GM #3819074. The last available GM part was GM #3941969. The latter is discontinued, though.
    In Appreciation of John Hinckley

    Comment

    • Larry M.
      Very Frequent User
      • January 1, 2002
      • 535

      #3
      Re: Wiper Blades

      Joe, I appreciate the infor. Actually I wanted the Trico callout to see if I can find them. I'm told they will be expensive.

      Comment

      • Larry M.
        Very Frequent User
        • January 1, 2002
        • 535

        #4
        Re: Wiper Blades

        For clarification, I am just talking about the refills. I have the correct wiper arms and the bright finish holders with Trico stamp (not USA).

        Comment

        • John H.
          Beyond Control Poster
          • December 1, 1997
          • 16513

          #5
          Re: Wiper Blades

          Originally posted by Larry Meyer (37196)
          Joe, I appreciate the infor. Actually I wanted the Trico callout to see if I can find them. I'm told they will be expensive.
          Larry -

          I think you're looking for Trico RF-15 refills.

          Comment

          • David L.
            Expired
            • July 31, 1980
            • 3310

            #6
            Re: Wiper Blades

            Years ago I bought about 2 dozen Trico RF-15 refills in boxes as shown in the photos below. Some were the 63-65 refills with the "dots" (or "bump") and some were the 66-67 refills with the "grooves".

            Dave



            Comment

            Working...

            Debug Information

            Searching...Please wait.
            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
            An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
            There are no results that meet this criteria.
            Search Result for "|||"