To restore or not to restore - NCRS Discussion Boards

To restore or not to restore

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Duke W.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • January 1, 1993
    • 15610

    #16
    Re: To restore or not to restore

    The first release of Z-06 included the 36.5 gallon tank, and the big tank was not available as a separate option. It was only available by ordering Z-06. The Z-06 optuon was theoretically available to the public at start of production, but the first batch went to racers. I believe until the December/January time frame two or three additional "batches" of first release Z-06 cars were produced. All of these Z-06 cars were built with the big tank.

    In the January/February time frame GM announced and began to build the second release Z-06. This second release unbundled the big tank and made it a separate option, N-03, and it was available on any Coupe without restriction. I actually considered ordering it for my SWC until I found out it took up most of the luggage compartment. Most of the '63s equipped with Z-06 are these second release versions and most did not have the big tank.

    There are experts out there on identifying authentic factory-built Z-06s. There have been discussions here on the TDB, and I also think there is a Z-06 registry of sorts on the Web.

    Your car appears to have had a lot of modifications over the years, but it's not logical for someone to have added the big tank, even years ago. It's not an easy installation, and the only reason to install the big tank would be if the owner at the time planned on entering long distance races. It wasn't necessary for the typical 20 minute SCCA races which is how most Corvette racers participated. The only US long distance event back then was Sebring.

    Does it have any evidence of HD brakes or HD suspension?

    I think you should do more research and talk to the experts before you draw conclusions.

    Duke

    Comment

    • Ron R.
      Very Frequent User
      • May 31, 1993
      • 190

      #17
      Re: To restore or not to restore

      No mods made to the car since I've owned it, like I said I purchased it in 1968. I never said I thought this car was ever a Z06, so please explain what you mean by drawing conclusions.Please look at pictures and tell me what you think of the tank..........and yes it does have what appears like heavy duty suspension, 7 leaf rear spring.......Ron

      Comment

      • Steven B.
        Extremely Frequent Poster
        • June 30, 1982
        • 3976

        #18
        Re: To restore or not to restore

        Ron, I think you will find the only HD suspension offering for '63 was the Z-06 option. You may have a very special car if it was born with the suspension, tank, etc. When was your car assembled? Steve

        Comment

        • Michael J.
          Extremely Frequent Poster
          • January 27, 2009
          • 7073

          #19
          Re: To restore or not to restore

          Indeed, and if you see that funky dual master cylinder, you may be in business.
          Big Tanks In the High Mountains of New Mexico

          Comment

          • Ron R.
            Very Frequent User
            • May 31, 1993
            • 190

            #20
            Re: To restore or not to restore

            VIN #3022, I BELIEVE NOV. 5TH OR 6TH, DON'T KNOW IF FRAME IS ORIGINAL FOR THE CAR, SINCE I CAN'T FIND ANY NUMBERS WITHOUT RAISING THE BODY. I WILL POST PICTURES TONIGHT WHEN I GEY OFF WORK. THE CAR IS PRETTY MUCH AS I PURCHASED 45 YEARS AGO. CAR HAS BEEN REPAINTED BEFORE I BOUGHT IT. APPEARS TO BE A BRIGHT BLUE METAL FLAKE COLOR UNDER THE CURRENT DARK BLUE COLOR. ONE MORE INTERESTING THING IS WHAT LOOKS LIKE SOFT BALL CUT OUTS ON THE TOP OF QUARTERS.
            Ron

            Comment

            • Steven B.
              Extremely Frequent Poster
              • June 30, 1982
              • 3976

              #21
              Re: To restore or not to restore

              Originally posted by Ron Reeves (22763)
              VIN #3022, I BELIEVE NOV. 5TH OR 6TH, DON'T KNOW IF FRAME IS ORIGINAL FOR THE CAR, SINCE I CAN'T FIND ANY NUMBERS WITHOUT RAISING THE BODY. I WILL POST PICTURES TONIGHT WHEN I GEY OFF WORK. THE CAR IS PRETTY MUCH AS I PURCHASED 45 YEARS AGO. CAR HAS BEEN REPAINTED BEFORE I BOUGHT IT. APPEARS TO BE A BRIGHT BLUE METAL FLAKE COLOR UNDER THE CURRENT DARK BLUE COLOR. ONE MORE INTERESTING THING IS WHAT LOOKS LIKE SOFT BALL CUT OUTS ON THE TOP OF QUARTERS.
              Ron
              "Possibly" if on rear quarters for brake cooling. If so may have been competed.

              Comment

              • Ron R.
                Very Frequent User
                • May 31, 1993
                • 190

                #22
                Re: To restore or not to restore

                Does NOT have dual master cyclinder and no evidence it ever had one...........

                Comment

                • Harry S.
                  Extremely Frequent Poster
                  • July 31, 2002
                  • 5258

                  #23
                  Re: To restore or not to restore

                  In the body shop they marked the Z06 cars. Written by the job number by the gas tank is Z06. It is also written on the interior floor below the speaker or where the speaker would be.


                  Comment

                  • Ron R.
                    Very Frequent User
                    • May 31, 1993
                    • 190

                    #24
                    Re: To restore or not to restore

                    This is NOT a Z06, just a big tank car........

                    Comment

                    • Harry S.
                      Extremely Frequent Poster
                      • July 31, 2002
                      • 5258

                      #25
                      Re: To restore or not to restore

                      Originally posted by Ron Reeves (22763)
                      This is NOT a Z06, just a big tank car........
                      I understand, I was just passing along some Z06 info to the other members.


                      Comment

                      • Ron R.
                        Very Frequent User
                        • May 31, 1993
                        • 190

                        #26
                        Re: To restore or not to restore

                        Sounds good, thanks for the information!

                        Comment

                        • Ron R.
                          Very Frequent User
                          • May 31, 1993
                          • 190

                          #27
                          Re: To restore or not to restore

                          63 CORVETTE PICTURES-001.jpg63 CORVETTE PICTURES-005.jpg63 CORVETTE PICTURES-011.jpg1963 CORVETTE TANK PICTURES-13.jpg

                          Comment

                          • Duke W.
                            Beyond Control Poster
                            • January 1, 1993
                            • 15610

                            #28
                            Re: To restore or not to restore

                            Originally posted by Ron Reeves (22763)
                            No mods made to the car since I've owned it, like I said I purchased it in 1968. I never said I thought this car was ever a Z06, so please explain what you mean by drawing conclusions.Please look at pictures and tell me what you think of the tank..........and yes it does have what appears like heavy duty suspension, 7 leaf rear spring.......Ron
                            In your post #15 you said:

                            "I'm ben told this is NOT a Z06 and I believe it"

                            Consider this: in 1968 when you bought your car a '63 Corvette was just a used car worth about $2000. You probably remember what you paid for it.

                            Virtually nobody knew what a Z-06 was and even if they did, who cared. That big tank just used up all the luggage space.

                            There was absolutely no motivation for someone to install the big tank in the field prior to '68 unless the owner planned long distance racing, which meant Sebring as that was the only long distance race in the USA back then, but it's not clear if your car was ever seriously raced before you bought it.

                            In post #24 you said:

                            "This is NOT a Z06, just a big tank car........ "

                            As I said in post #16, the only way the 36.5 gallon fuel tank could be installed in a November-built job was if Z-06 was ordered. The big tank did not become a separate option until at least January.

                            HD suspension and brakes were only installed in 1963 as part of the Z-06 option both first and second release. They were not available separately until the 1964 model year.

                            From what you have told us, I think there is sufficient evidence that you have a first release Z-06 that a thorough investigation is called for.

                            Are you aware what bonafide first release Z-06 is worth? Even with a NOM and wrong paint and other mods its current value may shock you. You may have a rare piece of Corvette history that many Corvette guys would give a nut for.

                            I'm trying to suggest that you do some research before you jump to conclusions or begin restoration work.

                            What about HD brakes? Any evidence? Look at the brake drums. Do they have fins? Most Z-06s lost their original master cylinder decades ago, so the installed master cylinder doesn't mean much.

                            I can't tell from the photos whether the tank installation appears to be plant or field, but there are guys out there who can probably determine so to a high level of certainty. Since first release Z-06s were built in batches, your VIN will be a significant part of the equation. Not all have been accounted for, and you may have one of the MIAs.

                            You need to get in touch with the Z-06 experts. A web search should reveal them.

                            Duke

                            Comment

                            • Ron R.
                              Very Frequent User
                              • May 31, 1993
                              • 190

                              #29
                              Re: To restore or not to restore

                              Duke,You really have a wealth of information, does not have heavy duty brakes or fins on the drums. the frame is what has me puzzled, since I can't seem to find any numbers on the frame. I did a through cleaning of the undercarriage years ago, so any markings are long gone.........I also noticed that the front wheel wells have been shaved a little to accommodate a larger tire and also what appears to be a mesh material on both sides of the radiator to possible cool the front brakes, the area below the gas cap lid is painted the sebring silver color and jack bracket is located over the tank in the rear of the car as opposed to under the drivers seat......

                              Comment

                              • David R.
                                Expired
                                • November 1, 1996
                                • 31

                                #30
                                Re: To restore or not to restore

                                Ron I took on a 61 project car for a friend after I retired. I have over 500 hours in it and it just is ready for the paint shop. It is a total frame off, what bolt, screw or nut that didn't break or stripped out wasn't worth saving. I just finished the engine and got the chrome back from the platters. The frame is done and waiting on the body to be painted. Blasting and cleaning parts now. I figure by the time I get it back on the road I'll have close to 1500 hours or more in the project. I figure he will have about $60,000 in the project not counting labor. I'm keeping up with my hours but not charging him for labor. A $100,000.00 to $120,000.00 estimate is pretty close unless you plan on doing a lot of the work yourself.

                                Comment

                                Working...

                                Debug Information

                                Searching...Please wait.
                                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                                An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                                There are no results that meet this criteria.
                                Search Result for "|||"