Re: Proof Of Ownership
Gary: First of all, the intial documents were accepted by the chapter judging chair and the owner was given an okay to have his Corvette judged, The decision was then reversed. We then were going provide a sworn affidavit showing valid proof of ownership of this Corvette and we were turned down on this. In all my readings of the NCRS judging guidelines the term "Proof Of Ownership" is used to have a Corvette judged. A title may be one form of proof of ownership; but there are also other ways of showing proof of ownership. This particular Corvette is a very low mileage unrestored 1967 Corvette, which I believe that the judges would be excited to see. What happened to the NCRS philosophy that the owner get the benefit of the doubt? In all my years as a supporting active NCRS member, I am truly saddend by the treatment that we have received on this!
Gary: First of all, the intial documents were accepted by the chapter judging chair and the owner was given an okay to have his Corvette judged, The decision was then reversed. We then were going provide a sworn affidavit showing valid proof of ownership of this Corvette and we were turned down on this. In all my readings of the NCRS judging guidelines the term "Proof Of Ownership" is used to have a Corvette judged. A title may be one form of proof of ownership; but there are also other ways of showing proof of ownership. This particular Corvette is a very low mileage unrestored 1967 Corvette, which I believe that the judges would be excited to see. What happened to the NCRS philosophy that the owner get the benefit of the doubt? In all my years as a supporting active NCRS member, I am truly saddend by the treatment that we have received on this!
Comment