Could a 65 396 pass a PV - NCRS Discussion Boards

Could a 65 396 pass a PV

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bill W.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • March 1, 1980
    • 2000

    Could a 65 396 pass a PV

    Could a 65 396 with a 4.56 & close ratio 4 speed pass a pv test with a nos L88 cam ?
  • Duke W.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • January 1, 1993
    • 15610

    #2
    Re: Could a 65 396 pass a PV

    I doubt it. That cam has a very knarly idle at not much less than 1500. The OE cam has a little lope at 900.

    The L-88 cam was designed for headers and open exhaust. It has an extreme amount of overlap. With manifolds and mufflers all that overlap kills low end torque and doesn't really help top end power. With the OE cam, manifolds and mufflers the engine will make more torque/power in the low end and little if any more on the top end. In fact the OE cam might even make more top end power. The 560 GHP rating that most of use are familiar with was with a properly designed unmuffled racing exhaust system and probably some head massaging.

    Race cams that are designed to operate best at 4000-7000 revs with a properly designed racing exhaust system are not a very good idea for a road engine. I'm sure you would find the driving experience much better with the OE cam, which is an excellent design for a high performance road engine.

    Duke

    Comment

    • Dick W.
      Former NCRS Director Region IV
      • June 30, 1985
      • 10483

      #3
      Re: Could a 65 396 pass a PV

      Originally posted by Bill Williamson (3245)
      Could a 65 396 with a 4.56 & close ratio 4 speed pass a pv test with a nos L88 cam ?
      Nope! We PV'd a '66 425 with one of those cams, had to add MSD box, plug wires, and coil to get it to idle at 900 rpm's. (See Judging Reference Manual "no performance enhancing additions", another rule change that my shenanigans caused ) No way that small an engine with that much overlap will idle much below 1,500 rpms
      Dick Whittington

      Comment

      • Bill W.
        Extremely Frequent Poster
        • March 1, 1980
        • 2000

        #4
        Re: Could a 65 396 pass a PV

        Thanks Duke & Dick just wishful thinking . I have a new GM L88 and a new GM L78 cam . I just love the sound of the big cams .

        Comment

        • Dick W.
          Former NCRS Director Region IV
          • June 30, 1985
          • 10483

          #5
          Re: Could a 65 396 pass a PV

          Originally posted by Bill Williamson (3245)
          Thanks Duke & Dick just wishful thinking . I have a new GM L88 and a new GM L78 cam . I just love the sound of the big cams .
          I love the sound also but if passing a PV is your goal, fergidaboutit.
          Dick Whittington

          Comment

          • Vinnie P.
            Editor NCRS Restorer Magazine
            • May 31, 1990
            • 1557

            #6
            Re: Could a 65 396 pass a PV

            Originally posted by Dick Whittington (8804)
            I love the sound also but if passing a PV is your goal, fergidaboutit.
            you spelled it wrong

            brooklyn.JPG

            Comment

            • Dick W.
              Former NCRS Director Region IV
              • June 30, 1985
              • 10483

              #7
              Re: Could a 65 396 pass a PV

              Originally posted by Vinnie Peters (17535)
              you spelled it wrong

              [ATTACH=CONFIG]52837[/ATTACH]
              No one has ever accused me of being ediducated
              Dick Whittington

              Comment

              • John D.
                Extremely Frequent Poster
                • December 1, 1979
                • 5507

                #8
                Re: Could a 65 396 pass a PV

                No one ever accused you of being able to talk either DW.

                Comment

                Working...

                Debug Information

                Searching...Please wait.
                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                There are no results that meet this criteria.
                Search Result for "|||"