65 Transistorized VOLTAGE REGULATOR? - NCRS Discussion Boards

65 Transistorized VOLTAGE REGULATOR?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mike Z.
    Very Frequent User
    • February 1, 1988
    • 226

    65 Transistorized VOLTAGE REGULATOR?

    Had a customer ask me a question: in the 65TIM&JG, 6th edition, page 175; "Regulators on L76-365 hp, L79-3550 hp cars with air-conditioning and transistor ignition, L-78-425 hp & L84-375 hp with K-66 use part number 1116368."

    I have serviced k-66 for many years and have only experienced transistorized voltage regulators on "steel" cars with the combination of K-66 w/air-conditioning combination. I have not experienced a customer with K-66 with a transistorized voltage regulator in a Corvette, regardless of air-conditioning or hp rating.

    I can almost understand cars equipped with a combo of A/C and K-66, to go along with the other Divisions at the time; but, I do not understand the L-78 and L-84 which did not have A/C as a co-option. My personal L-84 has K-66 from the factory, but no transistorized voltage regulator, nor does my customer's (L76 w/AC) who asked me the questions looking for a #368 regulator.

    So, is the book wrong or does anyone have added information on this subject? Has anyone seen a "368" installed in a Corvette?
  • Dick W.
    Former NCRS Director Region IV
    • June 30, 1985
    • 10483

    #2
    Re: 65 Transistorized VOLTAGE REGULATOR?

    They were installed, however I do not know if each and every one of the cars got one. Used to have a Sun tester to test those regulators.
    Dick Whittington

    Comment

    • Jimmy G.
      Very Frequent User
      • November 1, 1979
      • 975

      #3
      Re: 65 Transistorized VOLTAGE REGULATOR?

      65 365 A/C TI has one and dated to the car
      Founder - Carolinas Chapter NCRS

      Comment

      • Loren L.
        Extremely Frequent Poster
        • April 30, 1976
        • 4104

        #4
        Re: 65 Transistorized VOLTAGE REGULATOR?

        1116368 is correct; #23561, L79/C60/TI has one - but it's not quite that simple. 1116368 is another example of what Joe Lucia calls "production only" part #s; the SERVICE part # is 1116378. Somewhere I have a copy of the Delco Remy "Inventory" card that shows production 1964-69, with ONE unit being made in 1969 - I suspect for a Delco administrator who had one of those cars.

        Comment

        • Mike Z.
          Very Frequent User
          • February 1, 1988
          • 226

          #5
          Re: 65 Transistorized VOLTAGE REGULATOR?

          Thanks guys for the feed back and comments. You all zeroed in on the car/motors available with A/C as a POSSIBLE co-option. Actually, I agree with all of your comments, as I mentioned initially, but indicated I had never seen a #378 in a Corvette-you have educated me.
          My issue is: the manual says the couple of hp motors that you could order the K-66 and A/C combo (as all of you have mentioned), but it also says the 396 (which co-required K-66) & fuelie if optioned with K-66, both also would require the #378 reg.

          I checked the AIM, and it does have a note in K-66 section re: #378 w/C-60, which confirms what has been said. However, it does not mention 396 or fuelie.

          I have spent the last few hours calling several friends, customers and a couple of fuelie experts (that I will not name) and none have seen #378 on a fuelie, regardless of ignition. I, unfortunately do not have 396 cars separated out in my data base-I just remember most of the fuelie customers, because I have one.

          So, is the manual incorrect? Or, do I need to install a #378 on my fuelie?

          Comment

          • Don H.
            Moderator
            • June 16, 2009
            • 2236

            #6
            Re: 65 Transistorized VOLTAGE REGULATOR?

            Mike
            I suggest you contact Gary Summerville down in TX. I think he co-wrote the 65 Mech section, and has owned many 65 fuelies and he knows them well, and I bet he will say he has never seen your 378 reg on a fueler. You can find Gary in Member's List under Community in the small tool bar above. Members names are sorted by first name.

            Comment

            • Mike Z.
              Very Frequent User
              • February 1, 1988
              • 226

              #7
              Re: 65 Transistorized VOLTAGE REGULATOR?

              Thanks Don, Gary was one of the experts I referred to. He indicates he knows of no #378 on a fuel car. So, if anyone is a 396 specialiest we can all but rule out 396 & fuel cars requiring the #378, and only the combo of K-66 and A/C would have had the possibility of #378. Maybe this will be corrected in the next manual up-date.
              Thank you all, Mike

              Comment

              • Joe L.
                Beyond Control Poster
                • February 1, 1988
                • 43193

                #8
                Re: 65 Transistorized VOLTAGE REGULATOR?

                Originally posted by Mike Zamora (12455)
                Thanks guys for the feed back and comments. You all zeroed in on the car/motors available with A/C as a POSSIBLE co-option. Actually, I agree with all of your comments, as I mentioned initially, but indicated I had never seen a #378 in a Corvette-you have educated me.
                My issue is: the manual says the couple of hp motors that you could order the K-66 and A/C combo (as all of you have mentioned), but it also says the 396 (which co-required K-66) & fuelie if optioned with K-66, both also would require the #378 reg.

                I checked the AIM, and it does have a note in K-66 section re: #378 w/C-60, which confirms what has been said. However, it does not mention 396 or fuelie.

                I have spent the last few hours calling several friends, customers and a couple of fuelie experts (that I will not name) and none have seen #378 on a fuelie, regardless of ignition. I, unfortunately do not have 396 cars separated out in my data base-I just remember most of the fuelie customers, because I have one.

                So, is the manual incorrect? Or, do I need to install a #378 on my fuelie?
                Mike------


                According to GM, the only Corvettes which got the external mount transistorized regulator were those 1965's also equipped with SHP engine (i.e. L-79, L-76) AND also equipped with C-60 AND K-66. It's as simple as that. No other 1965 SHP Corvette (i.e. L-84, L-78) could have received that regulator because none were available with C-60.
                In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                Comment

                • Loren L.
                  Extremely Frequent Poster
                  • April 30, 1976
                  • 4104

                  #9
                  Re: 65 Transistorized VOLTAGE REGULATOR?

                  To state it again, 1116378 is A SERVICE REPLACEMENT - IT WAS NOT BUILT AT ST LOUIS IN 1965 WITH THAT REGULATOR.

                  Comment

                  • Joe L.
                    Beyond Control Poster
                    • February 1, 1988
                    • 43193

                    #10
                    Re: 65 Transistorized VOLTAGE REGULATOR?

                    Originally posted by Loren Lundberg (912)
                    To state it again, 1116378 is A SERVICE REPLACEMENT - IT WAS NOT BUILT AT ST LOUIS IN 1965 WITH THAT REGULATOR.
                    Loren------


                    No need to restate it; neither I nor anyone else here has said that the GM #1116378 was ever originally used on any 1965 Corvette. However, the GM #1116378 was not only a SERVICE regulator. It was used in PRODUCTION for all 1966-69 Chevrolet models with 62 amp alternator. It may or may not have been used on 1966 Corvettes with L-79, C-60 and K-66.

                    Also, the GM #1116368 regulator was once available in SERVICE. However, it was discontinued sometime about 1968 and replaced, for SERVICE, by the GM #1116378.

                    One other thing: both the GM #1116368 and GM #1116378 were initially available in SERVICE as NEW parts. However, shortly thereafter they became available, "officially", only as "rebuilt" parts and required a core deposit on purchase. Now, this does not mean that every one of these regulators sold after the change to rebuilt status was actually a rebuilt part. What it means is that, "officially", they were rebuilt units. Some may well have been brand new but a customer could not complain if they got a rebuilt unit since that's all that GM was "officially" providing.
                    In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                    Comment

                    • Kenneth F.
                      Very Frequent User
                      • September 30, 1988
                      • 282

                      #11
                      Re: 65 Transistorized VOLTAGE REGULATOR?

                      Would someone know what GM used this Delco Remy transistorized regulator for? The numbers are 398 12v M3. It has a red, black, and green wire.

                      Ken

                      Comment

                      • Joe L.
                        Beyond Control Poster
                        • February 1, 1988
                        • 43193

                        #12
                        Re: 65 Transistorized VOLTAGE REGULATOR?

                        Originally posted by Kenneth Files (13799)
                        Would someone know what GM used this Delco Remy transistorized regulator for? The numbers are 398 12v M3. It has a red, black, and green wire.

                        Ken
                        Ken------

                        The GM #1116398 regulator was used for GM applications which also were equipped with a series 20DN alternator. No Corvette or passenger car was ever equipped with such an alternator. So, I'd say MD/HD trucks, industrial engine applications and, possibly, light aircraft.
                        In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                        Comment

                        • Mike Z.
                          Very Frequent User
                          • February 1, 1988
                          • 226

                          #13
                          Re: 65 Transistorized VOLTAGE REGULATOR?

                          Thanks Joe, your opinion again verifies, that it is not likely applications within the 1965 Corvette model; would have come with a transistorized voltage regulator UNLESS it was equipped with SHP, K-66 AND air-conditioning. Threrfore, as presently printed the TIM & JG is incorrect to indicate L-84 & L78 would also have required the transistorized voltage regulator-correct?

                          Comment

                          • Mike M.
                            NCRS Past President
                            • May 31, 1974
                            • 8365

                            #14
                            Re: 65 Transistorized VOLTAGE REGULATOR?

                            one of our 65 FI's is a transistorized IGNITION and it came with its original 515 standard external voltage regulator. mike

                            Comment

                            • Joe L.
                              Beyond Control Poster
                              • February 1, 1988
                              • 43193

                              #15
                              Re: 65 Transistorized VOLTAGE REGULATOR?

                              Originally posted by Mike Zamora (12455)
                              Thanks Joe, your opinion again verifies, that it is not likely applications within the 1965 Corvette model; would have come with a transistorized voltage regulator UNLESS it was equipped with SHP, K-66 AND air-conditioning. Threrfore, as presently printed the TIM & JG is incorrect to indicate L-84 & L78 would also have required the transistorized voltage regulator-correct?
                              Mike-----


                              According to GM, that's the way it was; L-78 and L-84, not being available with C-60, were not equipped with the transistorized voltage regulator. Is it possible that some were originally so-equipped as a factory mistake? Yes, I'd say it's possible as long as the wiring harness was compatible (which I doubt).
                              In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                              Comment

                              Working...

                              Debug Information

                              Searching...Please wait.
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                              There are no results that meet this criteria.
                              Search Result for "|||"