information on this car - NCRS Discussion Boards

information on this car

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • John M.
    Infrequent User
    • September 22, 2024
    • 7

    information on this car

    A friend of mine is looking at this car. He says that several NCRS people have looked at it and tell him it is a really good car. Is this car familiar to any of you guys? Supposed to be white/blue interior but has black dash, carpets and seat backs. Someone told him that it was a rare "salt and pepper" edition! My friend is flying down Thursday to look at it. If I need to post this somewhere else please let me know. Thank you. John
    You do not have permission to view this gallery.
    This gallery has 1 photos.
  • Steven B.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • June 30, 1982
    • 3976

    #2
    John, a picture of the trim plate will help. Thanks!

    Comment

    • John M.
      Infrequent User
      • September 22, 2024
      • 7

      #3
      Not a great picture but all I have of the tag. I have included the motor stamp also.
      Attached Files

      Comment

      • Duke W.
        Beyond Control Poster
        • January 1, 1993
        • 15610

        #4
        I find it odd that anyone would order side pipes with A/C despite L-79. In addition to, IMO, side pipes being obnoxiously loud, they are, dyno proven, more restrictive than the under-the-car exhaust system, both base and N-11.

        John Hinckley always said that they were "marketing driven", not "engineering driven".

        Duke

        Comment

        • Rich G.
          Extremely Frequent Poster
          • August 31, 2002
          • 1396

          #5
          I thought side pipes were not available on AO Smith cars?
          1966 L79 Convertible. Milano Maroon
          1968 L71 Coupe. Rally Red (Sold 6/21)
          1963 Corvair Monza Convertible

          Comment

          • Leif A.
            Extremely Frequent Poster
            • August 31, 1997
            • 3607

            #6
            Originally posted by Duke Williams (22045)
            I find it odd that anyone would order side pipes with A/C despite L-79. In addition to, IMO, side pipes being obnoxiously loud, they are, dyno proven, more restrictive than the under-the-car exhaust system, both base and N-11.

            John Hinckley always said that they were "marketing driven", not "engineering driven".

            Duke
            Duke,
            Obnoxious to one is music to another...my factory side pipes were not "loud" at all, just a very nice mellow tone. Southern cars ordered with factory A/C were ordered with side pipes (in many cases) to keep the exhaust heat from under the car thus out of the cabin.
            Note the tank sticker from my '67 L79...sweetest car I ever owned.
            image.png
            Leif
            '67 Coupe L79, M21, C60, N14, N40, J50, A31, U69, A01, QB1
            Top Flight 2017 Lone Star Regional

            Comment

            • Tim G.
              Extremely Frequent Poster
              • March 1, 1990
              • 1358

              #7
              Code 450 is blue/white. Blue/black was not available in 1966. Sidepipes were not put on cars built at the AO Smith plant.

              Comment

              • John M.
                Infrequent User
                • September 22, 2024
                • 7

                #8
                Sorry guys, I should’ve been more specific. Obviously side pipes are added. Obviously the interior is wrong! The car is in Florida and the gentleman who owns it claims that it is very well known by NCIS members down there. I think he’s pulling our leg! So I was trying to see if somebody knew anything personally about the car. I threw in the engine pad stamp because I’m not an expert, but it does look good to me. The trim tag appears legit, but it’s really not a good enough picture to be certain. so general opinions on tag and stamp would be appreciated. Thanks!

                Comment

                • Bill M.
                  Extremely Frequent Poster
                  • July 31, 1989
                  • 1317

                  #9
                  Obnoxious is a statement that is obnoxious. I am 68 and still love side pipes never burned a leg I can hear my radio and it is so much easier to get to a failed 65 or 66 antenna.

                  Comment

                  • Joseph S.
                    National Judging Chairman
                    • March 1, 1985
                    • 831

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Bill McMorrow (15609)
                    Obnoxious is a statement that is obnoxious. I am 68 and still love side pipes never burned a leg I can hear my radio and it is so much easier to get to a failed 65 or 66 antenna.
                    Working on the rear suspension or transmission is a breeze also!!

                    Comment

                    Working...

                    Debug Information

                    Searching...Please wait.
                    An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                    Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                    An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                    Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                    An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                    There are no results that meet this criteria.
                    Search Result for "|||"