1967 Smog Pump - NCRS Discussion Boards

1967 Smog Pump

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • James G.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • May 31, 1976
    • 1556

    #16
    Re: 1967 Smog Pump

    Originally posted by Erik Dreijer (52136)
    The Order Copy Of My 67 Indicates
    Date Received 12/16-66
    Order #32857
    Exp. Date Of Production 01/27-67
    Zone 20
    Dealer 307.

    I Think This Means The Car Was Sold By Harry Mann/ L.a., Ca.
    When Were Smog Pumps Required For A California Car?
    Best
    On the tank sticker, ZONE 20 is Southern California, and DEALER 307 is Harry Mann. Are you sure it is a "real" tank sticker?

    And yes, All 67 Corvettes sold new in California had A.I.R. K-19 Smog equiptment. Now did a dealer like Harry Mann or Clippinger "dealer trade" cars with Las Vegas and Arizona Chevrolet dealers ? You bet, and those cars would not have a smog pump. But their tank stickers would be for the "original" dealer that ordered the car.

    In 1975-76, California ARB (Air Resource Board) caught up to the practice and changed the law to all cars coming into the state that reads

    "All cars must have California emmision certified engine / drivelines and unhood emmision stickers and then pass the California smog inspection before registration. They also "must have 7500 minimum miles" before entering the state.

    So if you live in say Colorado and just got transfered to Los Angeles and bought a new car last week and it has 2100 miles after you arrive at your new home you will not be able to legally register it until you have 7500 miles. LAW IS STILL IN EFFECT.
    Over 80 Corvettes of fun ! Love Rochester Fuel Injection 57-65 cars. Love CORVETTE RACE CARS
    Co-Founder REGISTRY OF CORVETTE RACE CARS.COM

    Comment

    • Erik D.
      Expired
      • August 30, 2010
      • 6

      #17
      Re: 1967 Smog Pump

      Originally posted by Robert Gallagher (17477)
      Do you have a photo of the tank sticker? Maybe we could figure it out better. Are you sure the expected date of production is 1-27-67?
      Sorry, I have been so long in getting back to you, but I damaged my right rotator cuff and after all the surgery and re-hab, I have not had Corvettes on the brain much. Couldn't shift it until now anyway.

      Yes, I have a photo. It is clear enough to read; ident # 809923, date received 12/16-66; Exp. Date of production 01/27-67 order # 32857, zone 20, dealer 307.

      I witnessed this being removed from the tank. All serial #'s, date codes, part #'s are correct.

      If it has been faked, someone went to a lot of trouble to do so.

      I have applied to NCRS for delivery data, so I guess we will see what they come back with.

      Thanks for your help and,
      Best,
      Erik

      Comment

      • Robert G.
        Expired
        • May 31, 1990
        • 429

        #18
        Re: 1967 Smog Pump

        For most if not all of Jan. 67, the expected date of production said (19)66, not 67. Somebody forgot to change the date in the computer. That's why I asked about a photo. I don't know when the date changed, but with a little research I could make a guess. Maybe somebody here knows for certain.
        Good luck with the shoulder.

        Comment

        • Mike M.
          NCRS Past President
          • May 31, 1974
          • 8365

          #19
          Re: 1967 Smog Pump

          Originally posted by Domenic Tallarita (51287)
          Is this good news for my 1967 435 HP 427? It is a california car and when I bought it in 1971 I thought the smog pump was removed.
          I am ready to order new manifolds now as the car had headers on it that I rejected when I bought the car SALVAGE from JD Corvette in paromount.
          OK experts whats the verdict? make my day.

          DOM
          all 67 435's sold new in calif(assuming it wasn't delivered to a non-calif chevy dealer who then traded it top a calif chevy dealer), had k-19. mike

          Comment

          • Domenic T.
            Expired
            • January 29, 2010
            • 2452

            #20
            Re: 1967 Smog Pump

            Thank's Mike, now I have to look in the L & K's. Are there more?

            DOM

            Comment

            • Erik D.
              Expired
              • August 30, 2010
              • 6

              #21
              Re: 1967 Smog Pump

              Thank you Sir,

              Hate to admit I am such a "Dino", but I am not sure how to send you a photo of the "tank sticker" yet.

              Arm is OK, I shortened the throw on the M-21. Works great.

              Best
              Erik Dreijer
              251 973 9082

              Comment

              • Mike M.
                NCRS Past President
                • May 31, 1974
                • 8365

                #22
                Re: 1967 Smog Pump

                Originally posted by Robert Gallagher (17477)
                For most if not all of Jan. 67, the expected date of production said (19)66, not 67. Somebody forgot to change the date in the computer. That's why I asked about a photo. I don't know when the date changed, but with a little research I could make a guess. Maybe somebody here knows for certain.
                Good luck with the shoulder.
                bob: FYI, my old 400hp a/c vette, vin 108272::: the tank sticker reads date received 12-13-66 abd expected date of delivery is 01-27-66. hope this adds info to your research.mike

                Comment

                • Robert G.
                  Expired
                  • May 31, 1990
                  • 429

                  #23
                  Re: 1967 Smog Pump

                  Originally posted by Mike McCagh (14)
                  bob: FYI, my old 400hp a/c vette, vin 108272::: the tank sticker reads date received 12-13-66 abd expected date of delivery is 01-27-66. hope this adds info to your research.mike
                  Thanks, that helps confirm late January and it's looking like the error continued into February.

                  Comment

                  • Robert G.
                    Expired
                    • May 31, 1990
                    • 429

                    #24
                    Re: 1967 Smog Pump

                    Originally posted by Erik Dreijer (52136)
                    Thank you Sir,

                    Hate to admit I am such a "Dino", but I am not sure how to send you a photo of the "tank sticker" yet.

                    Arm is OK, I shortened the throw on the M-21. Works great.

                    Best
                    Erik Dreijer
                    251 973 9082
                    To attach a photo to your post, click on 'manage attachments' which is below the text box that you type into. You don't need to post a photo for this.
                    I had trouble with my shoulder this year as well and had to shift carefully-nothing fast or hard.

                    Comment

                    • Erik D.
                      Expired
                      • August 30, 2010
                      • 6

                      #25
                      Re: 1967 Smog Pump

                      Hope This Works
                      Attached Files

                      Comment

                      • Robert G.
                        Expired
                        • May 31, 1990
                        • 429

                        #26
                        Re: 1967 Smog Pump

                        It ought to have the K-19. I can't see how it could be delivered to Calif without it. Maybe there were exceptions that we don't know about.

                        Comment

                        • Ara G.
                          Extremely Frequent Poster
                          • January 31, 2008
                          • 1108

                          #27
                          Re: 1967 Smog Pump

                          In no way do I profess myself an expert on tank stickers, but the perforations on the top of your tank sticker do not look like any of the alleged "real' ones I have seen over the years. The spacing between the perforations seems to be pretty far apart compared to "real" ones I've seen. Never doubt the lengths people will go to make something look real. I have seen many a time when something that "was" didn't turn out to be. Ara

                          Comment

                          • Brian M.
                            Extremely Frequent Poster
                            • February 1, 1997
                            • 1837

                            #28
                            Re: 1967 Smog Pump

                            My SER# 7471 shows date recvd 12-09-66 Exp date of prod 01-20-66.

                            Comment

                            Working...

                            Debug Information

                            Searching...Please wait.
                            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                            An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                            There are no results that meet this criteria.
                            Search Result for "|||"