Re: One persons opinion:
The conversation started with repro parts. If I had my 66 from 37 years ago I could easily demand that original should get more points then repro. Owning a car for 40+ years is not the problem. Its how do you get more people in the sport. So repros have to be allowed the same points as originals. If not then people will just feel slighted by those that got here first.
When I said I was going to join NCRS, I got a number of comments, most were not complimentary. So, if NCRS is going to survive they have to identify those issues and change them.
Allowing 3 point seat belts in cars that were not fitted with them would be a step forward. Allowing roll bar pads without deductions for a Vert would be another. So a person can unscrew the roll bar when being judged. Protecting people in daily drivers should be a priority.
If you wish to appeal to 25 year olds, then in some cases you have to bend. 20 years from now, the people looking for an old car to "keep fully restored" will fall exponentially. Why? the internet! We have kids that cannot find a street in their own home town without GPS. A car without an Ipod connection will be shunned. And a non satellite Radio will be dissed.
So if NCRS started thinking about a NCRS approved harness addition and placement now, then it would not cause butchery later. That is the one thing that scares me about this sport. A person who has money to burn, takes a top flight vehicle and rips all the old parts out butchers the car to make its a "functional daily driver".
So you get ahead of the curve. You allow a GPS, hands free, mirror as long as it is replaced with the original mirror for judging and you ignore the wiring harness hanging down, where the GPS mirror used to be.
I have no preconceived ideas what this club is, or what it will be like to attend a meet. I really enjoy "any effort" by anyone to keep an old car going, but I think any club has the responsibility to ensure they have the basic safety equipment to hopefully survive an accident, without point deduction. My desire to live is the same as the owner of a 67, so why should I face plant into the steering wheel of my 63 and he be saved by a 3 point seat belt on the way to be judged?
You and I obviously have a difference of opinion as to what ragging is? Constructive criticism is not ragging, some people do not feel worthy because the do not pass the litmus test of purity. Not my words, this is from people that are NCRS, or will not join because they have got it first hand from other NCRS people.
So, if it is a problem, and I am not saying it is, then all of this should be out in the open. In 20 years from now who is going to buy your corvette?
Is it the person demanding 6 air bags and 24/7 connection to the outside world? If not, then there will be 10s of thousands of us, all trying to sell to four people
The conversation started with repro parts. If I had my 66 from 37 years ago I could easily demand that original should get more points then repro. Owning a car for 40+ years is not the problem. Its how do you get more people in the sport. So repros have to be allowed the same points as originals. If not then people will just feel slighted by those that got here first.
When I said I was going to join NCRS, I got a number of comments, most were not complimentary. So, if NCRS is going to survive they have to identify those issues and change them.
Allowing 3 point seat belts in cars that were not fitted with them would be a step forward. Allowing roll bar pads without deductions for a Vert would be another. So a person can unscrew the roll bar when being judged. Protecting people in daily drivers should be a priority.
If you wish to appeal to 25 year olds, then in some cases you have to bend. 20 years from now, the people looking for an old car to "keep fully restored" will fall exponentially. Why? the internet! We have kids that cannot find a street in their own home town without GPS. A car without an Ipod connection will be shunned. And a non satellite Radio will be dissed.
So if NCRS started thinking about a NCRS approved harness addition and placement now, then it would not cause butchery later. That is the one thing that scares me about this sport. A person who has money to burn, takes a top flight vehicle and rips all the old parts out butchers the car to make its a "functional daily driver".
So you get ahead of the curve. You allow a GPS, hands free, mirror as long as it is replaced with the original mirror for judging and you ignore the wiring harness hanging down, where the GPS mirror used to be.
I have no preconceived ideas what this club is, or what it will be like to attend a meet. I really enjoy "any effort" by anyone to keep an old car going, but I think any club has the responsibility to ensure they have the basic safety equipment to hopefully survive an accident, without point deduction. My desire to live is the same as the owner of a 67, so why should I face plant into the steering wheel of my 63 and he be saved by a 3 point seat belt on the way to be judged?
Don't always believe everything you hear. Give it a little time before you jump in ragging on your new club.
So, if it is a problem, and I am not saying it is, then all of this should be out in the open. In 20 years from now who is going to buy your corvette?
Is it the person demanding 6 air bags and 24/7 connection to the outside world? If not, then there will be 10s of thousands of us, all trying to sell to four people

Comment