435 sequential vin engine pads-comments? - NCRS Discussion Boards

435 sequential vin engine pads-comments?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Will B.
    Frequent User
    • July 31, 2006
    • 56

    #16
    Re: 435 sequential vin engine pads-comments?

    So am I allowed to say which one I think is real?

    Comment

    • Peter S.
      Very Frequent User
      • March 28, 2012
      • 327

      #17
      Re: 435 sequential vin engine pads-comments?

      Originally posted by Will Barrett (46139)
      So am I allowed to say which one I think is real?
      You may burst into flames. From my absolutely untrained eye and comparing to the collection of deemed "correct" '67 L71 pads in my library, I'll throw my dart towards 586 is correct.

      Comment

      • Daniel Y.
        Very Frequent User
        • September 30, 2002
        • 185

        #18
        Re: 435 sequential vin engine pads-comments?

        didn't you get the hint? we're talking wooden nickels. why would they be on a Corvette pad? don't get discouraged - its a great hobby. go to meets - do your own investigation, make your own library of pads and if you ever want to buy a BB 67, get help from an expert. but ultimately, its your money. but i'll say it again - its a great hobby!
        Dan Young

        65, 67 Duntov x2
        66 bowtie x 2
        71 LT1 TF
        90 ZR1 McCelland
        03 Anniverary
        06 Z06

        Comment

        • Daniel Y.
          Very Frequent User
          • September 30, 2002
          • 185

          #19
          Re: 435 sequential vin engine pads-comments?

          now thats funny
          Dan Young

          65, 67 Duntov x2
          66 bowtie x 2
          71 LT1 TF
          90 ZR1 McCelland
          03 Anniverary
          06 Z06

          Comment

          • James G.
            Extremely Frequent Poster
            • May 31, 1976
            • 1556

            #20
            Re: 435 sequential vin engine pads-comments?

            So what you mean Roy, is of the 3754 built, there are only 8917 left, correct?
            Over 80 Corvettes of fun ! Love Rochester Fuel Injection 57-65 cars. Love CORVETTE RACE CARS
            Co-Founder REGISTRY OF CORVETTE RACE CARS.COM

            Comment

            • Edward B.
              Very Frequent User
              • January 1, 1988
              • 537

              #21
              Re: 435 sequential vin engine pads-comments?

              I'm curious as to how anyone would happen to come across three consecutive engine numbers and to be able to take pictures of them. Am I missing something here because the odds against finding a consecutive three out of the thousands either factory marked or restamped are astronomical.

              Comment

              • Steve B.
                Extremely Frequent Poster
                • March 1, 2002
                • 1190

                #22
                Re: 435 sequential vin engine pads-comments?

                Originally posted by Will Barrett (46139)
                So 1 of the 3 is real?

                I'm beginning to wonder if this hobby is for me...
                Will,
                If you have the passion for these cars then yes, this hobby is for you. As others have stated, take your time, go to meets and get involved. You will meet lots of great people willing to steer you in the right direction. Never buy on impulse and always seek the opinion of a pro before you spend you money. I would rather pay over market value for a car with no issues vs. a car that appears to be a deal with "skeletons in the closet"

                Comment

                • Robert G.
                  Expired
                  • May 31, 1990
                  • 429

                  #23
                  Re: 435 sequential vin engine pads-comments?

                  It has taken years of me collecting photos of vin pads and this is the first time I've come across 3 big blocks in a row like that. I wasn't looking for it, I just stumbled across it. I do have photos of xx630(2/2),xx632(2/16),xx633(2/15?),xx634(2/10-BB),xx636(2/15), but one is a big block and photos of a few of them aren't very good. The pad surface on the small blocks look much more as I would expect. I don't like the surfaces of any of those 435s.

                  Regarding odds of 3 435s in a row. If I recall probability correctly, there is a 2% chance of 3 435s in a row if they were built randomly.

                  Comment

                  • Kenneth B.
                    Extremely Frequent Poster
                    • August 31, 1984
                    • 2084

                    #24
                    Re: 435 sequential vin engine pads-comments?

                    Originally posted by Robert Gallagher (17477)
                    It has taken years of me collecting photos of vin pads and this is the first time I've come across 3 big blocks in a row like that. I wasn't looking for it, I just stumbled across it. I do have photos of xx630(2/2),xx632(2/16),xx633(2/15?),xx634(2/10-BB),xx636(2/15), but one is a big block and photos of a few of them aren't very good. The pad surface on the small blocks look much more as I would expect. I don't like the surfaces of any of those 435s.

                    Regarding odds of 3 435s in a row. If I recall probability correctly, there is a 2% chance of 3 435s in a row if they were built randomly.
                    I don't like any of the pad stampings. More to Roys point. No way that the 3 engines would have 3 different build dates & so far apart built one after another.
                    65 350 TI CONV 67 J56 435 CONV,67,390/AIR CONV,70 454/air CONV,
                    What A MAN WON'T SPEND TO GIVE HIS ASS A RIDE

                    Comment

                    • Kenneth B.
                      Extremely Frequent Poster
                      • August 31, 1984
                      • 2084

                      #25
                      Re: 435 sequential vin engine pads-comments?

                      Originally posted by James Gessner (943)
                      So what you mean Roy, is of the 3754 built, there are only 8917 left, correct?
                      Yes Jim! The 435'S are like the FI Corvettes the tended to multiply like the loves & fishes after a few years of being released from the factory & all have MATCHING #'S & THE REAL DEAL
                      65 350 TI CONV 67 J56 435 CONV,67,390/AIR CONV,70 454/air CONV,
                      What A MAN WON'T SPEND TO GIVE HIS ASS A RIDE

                      Comment

                      • Wayne M.
                        Expired
                        • March 1, 1980
                        • 6414

                        #26
                        Re: 435 sequential vin engine pads-comments?

                        Originally posted by Roy Sinor (2608)
                        .... I would be absolutely shocked to find that three 435’s in a row were ever built.

                        Then I would want to know how in the world since engines were racked as they came in and pulled as they were needed, how three cars built together ended up with engines that were in my opinion from three different racks, which had arrived in three different months. .....
                        Roy --- a little further on the subject of racks. GM Canada shipping records for 1969 MY show 4 consecutive BB VINs: 9S706395 thru #6398, then a gap (ie. a non-Canada car), then #6400. Allows us a rare snapshot of the production line at a particular moment.

                        #6395 is L68; # 6396 is L68 w/K66; #6397 is L89; #6398 is L36 w/K66; [skip #6399]; #6400 is an L71. So were these 5 different 427's on 5 different racks, because of the assembly stamp suffix ?

                        Did I mention that Canadians were suckers for big blocks that year ?

                        In 1969 was St. Louis running 2 shifts to accomodate the demand for almost 39,000 cars with an extended production year ? Five minutes per completed car, or ?

                        Agree with you on the wide spread on engine assembly dates, but three L71's in a row ?? Personally, I'd never say never.

                        Comment

                        • Dick W.
                          Former NCRS Director Region IV
                          • June 30, 1985
                          • 10483

                          #27
                          Re: 435 sequential vin engine pads-comments?

                          Originally posted by Wayne Midkiff (3437)
                          Roy --- a little further on the subject of racks. GM Canada shipping records for 1969 MY show 4 consecutive BB VINs: 9S706395 thru #6398, then a gap (ie. a non-Canada car), then #6400. Allows us a rare snapshot of the production line at a particular moment.

                          #6395 is L68; # 6396 is L68 w/K66; #6397 is L89; #6398 is L36 w/K66; [skip #6399]; #6400 is an L71. So were these 5 different 427's on 5 different racks, because of the assembly stamp suffix ?

                          Did I mention that Canadians were suckers for big blocks that year ?

                          In 1969 was St. Louis running 2 shifts to accomodate the demand for almost 39,000 cars with an extended production year ? Five minutes per completed car, or ?

                          Agree with you on the wide spread on engine assembly dates, but three L71's in a row ?? Personally, I'd never say never.
                          Sixteen months of production, about 2,500 cars per month, about 587 cars a week, little over 113 cars a day or 14 cars per hour, based on eight hours a day, five days a week production.
                          Dick Whittington

                          Comment

                          • John H.
                            Beyond Control Poster
                            • December 1, 1997
                            • 16513

                            #28
                            Re: 435 sequential vin engine pads-comments?

                            Originally posted by Dick Whittington (8804)
                            Sixteen months of production, about 2,500 cars per month, about 587 cars a week, little over 113 cars a day or 14 cars per hour, based on eight hours a day, five days a week production.
                            Dick -

                            St. Louis ran two shifts per day from 1963 on.

                            Comment

                            • Michael H.
                              Expired
                              • January 29, 2008
                              • 7477

                              #29
                              Re: 435 sequential vin engine pads-comments?

                              Originally posted by Dick Whittington (8804)
                              Sixteen months of production, about 2,500 cars per month, about 587 cars a week, little over 113 cars a day or 14 cars per hour, based on eight hours a day, five days a week production.
                              Dick,

                              I think it was closer to around seven jobs per hour for the late C2/early C3 cars.

                              Comment

                              • Terry M.
                                Beyond Control Poster
                                • September 30, 1980
                                • 15573

                                #30
                                Re: 435 sequential vin engine pads-comments?

                                Originally posted by Wayne Midkiff (3437)
                                Roy --- a little further on the subject of racks. GM Canada shipping records for 1969 MY show 4 consecutive BB VINs: 9S706395 thru #6398, then a gap (ie. a non-Canada car), then #6400. Allows us a rare snapshot of the production line at a particular moment.

                                #6395 is L68; # 6396 is L68 w/K66; #6397 is L89; #6398 is L36 w/K66; [skip #6399]; #6400 is an L71. So were these 5 different 427's on 5 different racks, because of the assembly stamp suffix ?
                                From the conversations I had with both Flint and Tonawanda workers the different engine types (ei: suffix codes) were built in batches at both plants. Thus I would expect each suffix code to have its own rack, but John Hinckley could tell us more.
                                Terry

                                Comment

                                Working...

                                Debug Information

                                Searching...Please wait.
                                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                                An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                                There are no results that meet this criteria.
                                Search Result for "|||"